In my textbook, it states that the maximum variety of electrons that have the right to fit in any type of given covering is given by 2n². This would typical 2 electrons might fit in the an initial shell, 8 might fit in the 2nd shell, 18 in the 3rd shell, and also 32 in the 4th shell.

However, ns was formerly taught that the maximum variety of electrons in the an initial orbital is 2, 8 in the 2nd orbital, 8 in the 3rd shell, 18 in the fourth orbital, 18 in the fifth orbital, 32 in the sixth orbital. I am fairly sure the orbitals and shells room the very same thing.

Which of these two methods is correct and also should be provided to uncover the variety of electrons in an orbital?

I to be in high school so please shot to leveling your answer and use reasonably basic terms.

You are watching: How many electrons can be contained in all of the orbitals with n = 4? electron electronic-configuration
improve this question
edited jan 22 "17 at 9:54

Melanie Shebel♦
6,32099 gold badges4242 silver- badges8181 bronze title
asked Feb 20 "14 in ~ 4:13

56733 gold badges77 silver badges1010 bronze badges
add a comment |

3 answer 3

energetic oldest Votes
Shells and orbitals space not the same. In terms of quantum numbers, electron in various shells will certainly have different values of major quantum number n.

To answer her question...

In the very first shell (n=1), us have:

The 1s orbital

In the 2nd shell (n=2), us have:

The 2s orbitalThe 2p orbitals

In the third shell (n=3), we have:

The 3s orbitalThe 3p orbitalsThe 3d orbitals

In the 4th shell (n=4), us have:

The 4s orbitalThe 4p orbitalsThe 4d orbitalsThe 4f orbitals

So one more kind of orbitals (s, p, d, f) becomes obtainable as us go to a shell with greater n. The number in front of the letter signifies which shell the orbital(s) are in. For this reason the 7s orbital will be in the 7th shell.

Now for the various kinds of orbitalsEach kind of orbital has actually a various "shape", together you deserve to see on the snapshot below. Friend can additionally see that:

The s-kind has only one orbitalThe p-kind has three orbitalsThe d-kind has five orbitalsThe f-kind has seven orbitals


Each orbital deserve to hold two electrons. One spin-up and one spin-down. This means that the 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, etc., have the right to each organize two electrons since they each have only one orbital.

The 2p, 3p, 4p, etc., have the right to each hold six electrons since they each have three orbitals, that can hold two electrons every (3*2=6).

The 3d, 4d etc., deserve to each host ten electrons, since they each have actually five orbitals, and each orbital have the right to hold two electron (5*2=10).

Thus, to discover the variety of electrons possible per shell

First, we look in ~ the n=1 covering (the an initial shell). It has:

The 1s orbital

An s-orbital stop 2 electrons. Hence n=1 shell can hold two electrons.

The n=2 (second) shell has:

The 2s orbitalThe 2p orbitals

s-orbitals have the right to hold 2 electrons, the p-orbitals have the right to hold 6 electrons. Thus, the 2nd shell can have 8 electrons.

The n=3 (third) shell has:

The 3s orbitalThe 3p orbitalsThe 3d orbitals

s-orbitals have the right to hold 2 electrons, p-orbitals have the right to hold 6, and d-orbitals have the right to hold 10, because that a total of 18 electrons.

Therefore, the formula $2n^2$ holds! What is the difference between your two methods?

There"s crucial distinction between "the variety of electrons feasible in a shell" and also "the variety of valence electrons possible for a duration of elements".

See more: How Tall Is 1.65 Meters In Feet, How Tall Is 1

There"s space for $18 exte^-$ in the third shell: $3s + 3p + 3d = 2 + 6 + 10 = 18$, however, aspects in the third period only have up come 8 valence electrons. This is due to the fact that the $3d$-orbitals aren"t filled till we gain to aspects from the fourth period - ie. Facets from the third period don"t fill the 3rd shell.

The orbitals are filled so that the persons of lowest energy are filled first. The energy is about like this: