This inquiry sounds straightforward to answer. Well so ns thought prior to a colleague carried to my fist one point that i did not critically think of. We break-up in explaining why this is so when he mentioned the ion in question: Mg2+. So why is Mg2+ smaller sized than one Mg atom?My answer consists of two entries:1) given that the radius of the atom is the distance between the nucleus and the outermost shell (I'm making use of the valve der Waals radius due to the fact that it offer a much better purpose in answering this question), this distance becomes smaller sized in Mg2+ due to the fact that the third shell is not inhabited anymore. Since the outermost lived in shell in Mg2+ is the 2nd one, and since the 2nd shell is closer come the nucleus that the third, this offers Mg2+ a smaller radius 보다 Mg.2) The repulsion between the electron in the third shell and also the electron in the 2nd shell lowers the average force of attraction every electron in the 2nd shell feels from the cell nucleus in an Mg atom. Due to the fact that 2 electron are removed in Mg2+, then we have the right to say the the typical repulsion the electron in the 2nd shell feel currently is less and also so the average pressure of attraction the electron in the second shell space feeling now in Mg2+ increases. This results in 'pulling' the electron cloud closer to the cell core in Mg2+.My colleague argues that the very first explanation is correct while the 2nd is nonsense. He asks me the following question:If my 2nd point to be correct, then would certainly the distance in between the nucleus and also the 2nd shell in one Mg atom (let's no forget the there is the third shell lived in in one Mg atom) be larger than the distance in between the nucleus and the second shell in Mg2+?


You are watching: Positive ions are smaller than the atoms

Logged
*
CorribusChemistSr. Member
*
Posts: 3199Mole Snacks: +485/-22Gender:
*
A lover of spectroscopy and chocolate.
*

First, simply so you're clear, there really is no such thing as a difficult radius because that an atom or ion. It's a purely experimental parameter.Of your 2 potential explanations, #1 is definitely the most crucial for many ions. But I don't regard #2 together nonsense at all, although in most instances it's no a big contributor come the efficient ionic radius. If you have two electron in the same shell, they will shield every other. For instance, in the situation of Mg, each 2s electron partially blocks the various other from the full power that the nuclear core charge (because every electron spends some of its time closer to the nucleus 보다 the other). If you were able to eliminate a single electron, the effective core fee felt by the other would it is in increased, i beg your pardon would bring about some degree of contraction. However Mg+ doesn't really persist for any kind of length the time, and also since the ionic radius is basically figured out by measure up the inter-nuclear distance and dividing through two, friend won't really find any values because that the ionic radius the Mg+ to demonstrate this effect.Technically speaking, the 2s electron of Magnesium additionally shield the 1s electrons due to the fact that of penetration effects, yet the level of that is an extremely tiny. Nevertheless, this does mean that removed the 2s electron will likewise cause convulsion of the 1s electrons. Because of this some of the observed smaller sized atomic radius of Mg2+ contrasted to Mg is resulting from her explanation #2. But, it's such a little effect compared to the ns of an entire shell the it's nearly not worth mentioning. I can't put any exact number on it turn off the top of my head however of the ~45 pm distinction in radius in between Mg and also Mg2+, I'd guess her explanation #2 accounts because that no an ext than ~2 afternoon of it. To uncover out for sure you'd have to do some type of calculate of the atom wavefunctions to view what kind of contraction you acquire for the inner covering electrons when you remove those in the outer shell, or look for indirect proof (photoelectron spectra, possibly).
Logged


See more: What Type Of Bond Is Kbr (Potassium Bromide) Ionic Or Covalent?

What men are poets who can speak the Jupiter if the were favor a man, however if the is an tremendous spinning ball of methane and also ammonia must be silent? - Richard P. Feynman